# InvokeAI vs PicImpact

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | InvokeAI | PicImpact |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 ✓ | 57/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Image Generation | #14 of 41 in Photo Management |
| GitHub stars | 28 913 ✓ | 1 315 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +627 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 ✓ | 9 |
| Latest release | v6.14.2 · 27 Sept 2026 ✓ | v3.3.8 · 23 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

InvokeAI scores 82/100 against 57/100 for PicImpact, so it is the safer default.

InvokeAI ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for PicImpact.

If you want the quickest setup, InvokeAI is easier to run; PicImpact needs more configuration.

InvokeAI is growing faster right now (+627 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [InvokeAI](https://selfhost.directory/project/invokeai) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/invokeai.md)
- [PicImpact](https://selfhost.directory/project/picimpact) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/picimpact.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/invokeai-vs-picimpact