# InvokeAI vs pandaprobe

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | InvokeAI | pandaprobe |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 ✓ | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Image Generation | #43 of 124 in AI |
| GitHub stars | 28 913 ✓ | 792 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +627 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 | 16 ✓ |
| Latest release | v6.14.2 · 27 Sept 2026 | v0.7.0 · 4 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

InvokeAI scores 82/100 against 51/100 for pandaprobe, so it is the safer default.

pandaprobe ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 13 for InvokeAI.

If you want the quickest setup, InvokeAI is easier to run; pandaprobe needs more configuration.

InvokeAI is growing faster right now (+627 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [InvokeAI](https://selfhost.directory/project/invokeai) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/invokeai.md)
- [pandaprobe](https://selfhost.directory/project/pandaprobe) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/pandaprobe.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/invokeai-vs-pandaprobe