# InvokeAI vs ibl.ai/os

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | InvokeAI | ibl.ai/os |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 ✓ | 55/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Image Generation | #65 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 28 911 ✓ | 793 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +625 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 ✓ | 10 |
| Latest release | v6.14.2 · 27 Sept 2026 | v0.182.2 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

InvokeAI scores 82/100 against 55/100 for ibl.ai/os, so it is the safer default.

InvokeAI ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for ibl.ai/os.

If you want the quickest setup, InvokeAI is easier to run; ibl.ai/os needs more configuration.

InvokeAI is growing faster right now (+625 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [InvokeAI](https://selfhost.directory/project/invokeai) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/invokeai.md)
- [ibl.ai/os](https://selfhost.directory/project/os-2) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/os-2.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/invokeai-vs-os-2