# InvokeAI vs Operant

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | InvokeAI | Operant |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 ✓ | 39/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Image Generation | #170 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 28 903 ✓ | 447 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +623 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 ✓ | 1 |
| Latest release | v6.14.2 · 27 Sept 2026 | desktop-candidate-2026-09-28-08e65ea · 28 Sept 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

InvokeAI scores 82/100 against 39/100 for Operant, so it is the safer default.

InvokeAI ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Operant.

If you want the quickest setup, InvokeAI is easier to run; Operant needs more configuration.

InvokeAI is growing faster right now (+623 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [InvokeAI](https://selfhost.directory/project/invokeai) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/invokeai.md)
- [Operant](https://selfhost.directory/project/operant) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/operant.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/invokeai-vs-operant