# InvokeAI vs Janus WebRTC Server

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | InvokeAI | Janus WebRTC Server |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 ✓ | 70/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Image Generation | #9 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 28 911 ✓ | 9 197 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +625 ✓ | +27 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v6.14.2 · 27 Sept 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | C |

## Which one should you pick?

InvokeAI scores 82/100 against 70/100 for Janus WebRTC Server, so it is the safer default.

InvokeAI ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Janus WebRTC Server.

If you want the quickest setup, InvokeAI is easier to run; Janus WebRTC Server needs more configuration.

InvokeAI is growing faster right now (+625 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [InvokeAI](https://selfhost.directory/project/invokeai) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/invokeai.md)
- [Janus WebRTC Server](https://selfhost.directory/project/janus-webrtc-server) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/janus-webrtc-server.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/invokeai-vs-janus-webrtc-server