# invoice-ninja vs Tube Archivist

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | invoice-ninja | Tube Archivist |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 70/100 | 72/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 11 in Invoicing | #7 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 10 364 ✓ | 8 552 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +254 ✓ | +83 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 36 ✓ | 6 |
| Latest release | v5.13.50 · 21 Oct 2026 | v0.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | PHP | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Tube Archivist scores 72/100 against 70/100 for invoice-ninja, so it is the safer default.

invoice-ninja ships more often: 36 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Tube Archivist.

If you want the quickest setup, invoice-ninja is easier to run; Tube Archivist needs more configuration.

invoice-ninja is growing faster right now (+254 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [invoice-ninja](https://selfhost.directory/project/invoice-ninja) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/invoice-ninja.md)
- [Tube Archivist](https://selfhost.directory/project/tube-archivist) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tube-archivist.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/invoice-ninja-vs-tube-archivist