# Invidious vs Zigbee2MQTT

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Invidious | Zigbee2MQTT |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 ✓ | 76/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 54 in Media Streaming | #5 of 104 in Home Automation |
| GitHub stars | 25 800 ✓ | 15 762 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 029 ✓ | +98 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 15 ✓ |
| Latest release | v2.20261022.0 · 22 Oct 2026 ✓ | 2.14.2 · 1 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Crystal | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Invidious scores 80/100 against 76/100 for Zigbee2MQTT, so it is the safer default.

Zigbee2MQTT ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Invidious.

Invidious is growing faster right now (+1 029 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Invidious](https://selfhost.directory/project/invidious) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/invidious.md)
- [Zigbee2MQTT](https://selfhost.directory/project/zigbee2mqtt) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zigbee2mqtt.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/invidious-vs-zigbee2mqtt