# Invidious vs UUSEC WAF

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Invidious | UUSEC WAF |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 ✓ | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 54 in Media Streaming | #2 of 3 in Web Application Firewall |
| GitHub stars | 25 799 ✓ | 1 718 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 055 ✓ | +6 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 9 ✓ |
| Latest release | v2.20261022.0 · 22 Oct 2026 ✓ | v7.2.6 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | BSD-2-Clause |
| Main language | Crystal | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

Invidious scores 81/100 against 59/100 for UUSEC WAF, so it is the safer default.

UUSEC WAF ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Invidious.

Invidious is growing faster right now (+1 055 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Invidious](https://selfhost.directory/project/invidious) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/invidious.md)
- [UUSEC WAF](https://selfhost.directory/project/uusec-waf) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uusec-waf.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/invidious-vs-uusec-waf