# Invidious vs url-to-png

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Invidious | url-to-png |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 ✓ | 49/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 54 in Media Streaming | #13 of 16 in Web Scraping |
| GitHub stars | 25 800 ✓ | 256 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 029 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 ✓ | 2 |
| Latest release | v2.20261022.0 · 22 Oct 2026 ✓ | v2.1.4 · 18 Apr 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Crystal | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Invidious scores 80/100 against 49/100 for url-to-png, so it is the safer default.

Invidious ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for url-to-png.

If you want the quickest setup, url-to-png is easier to run; Invidious needs more configuration.

Invidious is growing faster right now (+1 029 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Invidious](https://selfhost.directory/project/invidious) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/invidious.md)
- [url-to-png](https://selfhost.directory/project/url-to-png) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/url-to-png.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/invidious-vs-url-to-png