# Infisical vs uptime-kuma

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Infisical | uptime-kuma |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 | 88/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Secrets Management | #3 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 30 129 | 93 060 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +713 | +1 266 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 79 ✓ | 19 |
| Latest release | v0.167.4 · 26 Oct 2026 | 2.5.8 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

uptime-kuma scores 88/100 against 78/100 for Infisical, so it is the safer default.

Infisical ships more often: 79 stable releases in the past year, against 19 for uptime-kuma.

If you want the quickest setup, uptime-kuma is easier to run; Infisical needs more configuration.

## Details

- [Infisical](https://selfhost.directory/project/infisical) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/infisical.md)
- [uptime-kuma](https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/infisical-vs-uptime-kuma