# Infisical vs Tube Archivist

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Infisical | Tube Archivist |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 ✓ | 72/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Secrets Management | #7 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 30 133 ✓ | 8 553 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +717 ✓ | +84 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 79 ✓ | 6 |
| Latest release | v0.167.4 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Other | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Infisical scores 78/100 against 72/100 for Tube Archivist, so it is the safer default.

Infisical ships more often: 79 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Tube Archivist.

Infisical is growing faster right now (+717 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Infisical](https://selfhost.directory/project/infisical) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/infisical.md)
- [Tube Archivist](https://selfhost.directory/project/tube-archivist) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tube-archivist.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/infisical-vs-tube-archivist