InfisicalvsOpenReader
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Infisical | OpenReader | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Secrets Management | #4 of 15 in Audiobook Management |
| GitHub stars | 30 114 | 550 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +698 | +34 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 79 | 19 |
| Latest release | v0.167.4 · 26 Oct 2026 | v5.4.0 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Infisical scores 78/100 against 59/100 for OpenReader, so it is the safer default.
Infisical ships more often: 79 stable releases in the past year, against 19 for OpenReader.
If you want the quickest setup, OpenReader is easier to run; Infisical needs more configuration.
Infisical is growing faster right now (+698 stars in 30 days).
Infisical details →OpenReader details →