# Infisical vs openclaw

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Infisical | openclaw |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 | 93/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Secrets Management | #1 of 124 in AI |
| GitHub stars | 30 127 | 393 343 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +711 | +2 919 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 79 ✓ | 37 |
| Latest release | v0.167.4 · 26 Oct 2026 | v2026.10.8 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

openclaw scores 93/100 against 78/100 for Infisical, so it is the safer default.

Infisical ships more often: 79 stable releases in the past year, against 37 for openclaw.

If you want the quickest setup, openclaw is easier to run; Infisical needs more configuration.

openclaw is growing faster right now (+2 919 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Infisical](https://selfhost.directory/project/infisical) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/infisical.md)
- [openclaw](https://selfhost.directory/project/openclaw) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openclaw.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/infisical-vs-openclaw