Infisicalvsopenclaw
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Infisical | openclaw | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 | 93/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Secrets Management | #1 of 124 in AI |
| GitHub stars | 30 127 | 393 343 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +711 | +2 919 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 79 | 37 |
| Latest release | v0.167.4 · 26 Oct 2026 | v2026.10.8 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
openclaw scores 93/100 against 78/100 for Infisical, so it is the safer default.
Infisical ships more often: 79 stable releases in the past year, against 37 for openclaw.
If you want the quickest setup, openclaw is easier to run; Infisical needs more configuration.
openclaw is growing faster right now (+2 919 stars in 30 days).
Infisical details →openclaw details →