# Infisical vs mkcertWeb

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Infisical | mkcertWeb |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 ✓ | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Secrets Management | #6 of 8 in Certificate Management |
| GitHub stars | 30 096 ✓ | 221 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +697 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 79 ✓ | 13 |
| Latest release | v0.167.4 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ | v4.4.2 · 15 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Other | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

Infisical scores 78/100 against 48/100 for mkcertWeb, so it is the safer default.

Infisical ships more often: 79 stable releases in the past year, against 13 for mkcertWeb.

If you want the quickest setup, mkcertWeb is easier to run; Infisical needs more configuration.

Infisical is growing faster right now (+697 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Infisical](https://selfhost.directory/project/infisical) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/infisical.md)
- [mkcertWeb](https://selfhost.directory/project/mkcertweb) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mkcertweb.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/infisical-vs-mkcertweb