# Infisical vs MediaMTX

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Infisical | MediaMTX |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 | 79/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Secrets Management | #3 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 30 114 ✓ | 20 539 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +698 ✓ | +287 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 79 ✓ | 18 |
| Latest release | v0.167.4 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.21.3 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

MediaMTX scores 79/100 against 78/100 for Infisical, so it is the safer default.

Infisical ships more often: 79 stable releases in the past year, against 18 for MediaMTX.

If you want the quickest setup, MediaMTX is easier to run; Infisical needs more configuration.

Infisical is growing faster right now (+698 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Infisical](https://selfhost.directory/project/infisical) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/infisical.md)
- [MediaMTX](https://selfhost.directory/project/mediamtx) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mediamtx.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/infisical-vs-mediamtx