InfisicalvsKong
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Infisical | Kong | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 | 81/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Secrets Management | #1 of 19 in API Management |
| GitHub stars | 30 096 | 44 314 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +697 | +128 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 79 | 3 |
| Latest release | v0.167.4 · 26 Oct 2026 | 3.9.4 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Lua |
Which one should you pick?
Kong scores 81/100 against 78/100 for Infisical, so it is the safer default.
Infisical ships more often: 79 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for Kong.
Infisical is growing faster right now (+697 stars in 30 days).
Infisical details →Kong details →