# Infisical vs Komga

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Infisical | Komga |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 ✓ | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Secrets Management | #6 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 30 118 ✓ | 6 796 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +702 ✓ | +106 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 79 ✓ | 18 |
| Latest release | v0.167.4 · 26 Oct 2026 | 1.29.2 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Kotlin |

## Which one should you pick?

Infisical scores 78/100 against 73/100 for Komga, so it is the safer default.

Infisical ships more often: 79 stable releases in the past year, against 18 for Komga.

If you want the quickest setup, Komga is easier to run; Infisical needs more configuration.

Infisical is growing faster right now (+702 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Infisical](https://selfhost.directory/project/infisical) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/infisical.md)
- [Komga](https://selfhost.directory/project/komga) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/komga.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/infisical-vs-komga