# Infisical vs jenkins

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Infisical | jenkins |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 | 82/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Secrets Management | #1 of 28 in CI/CD |
| GitHub stars | 30 106 ✓ | 26 704 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +707 ✓ | +123 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 79 ✓ | 32 |
| Latest release | v0.167.4 · 26 Oct 2026 | jenkins-2.580.2 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Java |

## Which one should you pick?

jenkins scores 82/100 against 78/100 for Infisical, so it is the safer default.

Infisical ships more often: 79 stable releases in the past year, against 32 for jenkins.

If you want the quickest setup, jenkins is easier to run; Infisical needs more configuration.

Infisical is growing faster right now (+707 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Infisical](https://selfhost.directory/project/infisical) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/infisical.md)
- [jenkins](https://selfhost.directory/project/jenkins) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/jenkins.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/infisical-vs-jenkins