# indico vs uptime-kuma

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | indico | uptime-kuma |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 65/100 | 88/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 3 in Conference Management | #3 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 2 122 | 93 062 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +12 | +1 268 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 19 ✓ |
| Latest release | v3.3.14 · 13 Oct 2026 | 2.5.8 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

uptime-kuma scores 88/100 against 65/100 for indico, so it is the safer default.

uptime-kuma ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for indico.

If you want the quickest setup, uptime-kuma is easier to run; indico needs more configuration.

uptime-kuma is growing faster right now (+1 268 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [indico](https://selfhost.directory/project/indico) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/indico.md)
- [uptime-kuma](https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/indico-vs-uptime-kuma