# Incus vs Zigbee2MQTT

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Incus | Zigbee2MQTT |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 | 76/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 44 in Container Management | #5 of 104 in Home Automation |
| GitHub stars | 6 520 | 15 762 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +274 ✓ | +98 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 ✓ | 15 |
| Latest release | v7.0.2 · 16 Oct 2026 ✓ | 2.14.2 · 1 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Zigbee2MQTT scores 76/100 against 75/100 for Incus, so it is the safer default.

Incus ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 15 for Zigbee2MQTT.

If you want the quickest setup, Zigbee2MQTT is easier to run; Incus needs more configuration.

Incus is growing faster right now (+274 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Incus](https://selfhost.directory/project/incus) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/incus.md)
- [Zigbee2MQTT](https://selfhost.directory/project/zigbee2mqtt) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zigbee2mqtt.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/incus-vs-zigbee2mqtt