# Incus vs Zammad

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Incus | Zammad |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 ✓ | 70/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 44 in Container Management | #1 of 9 in Helpdesk |
| GitHub stars | 6 517 ✓ | 6 050 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +277 ✓ | +103 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v7.0.2 · 16 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Ruby |

## Which one should you pick?

Incus scores 75/100 against 70/100 for Zammad, so it is the safer default.

Incus ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Zammad.

Incus is growing faster right now (+277 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Incus](https://selfhost.directory/project/incus) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/incus.md)
- [Zammad](https://selfhost.directory/project/zammad) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zammad.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/incus-vs-zammad