Incusvswraft
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Incus | wraft | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 | 44/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 44 in Container Management | #35 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 6 525 | 167 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +279 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 3 |
| Latest release | v7.0.2 · 16 Oct 2026 | v0.6.7 · 25 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Elixir |
Which one should you pick?
Incus scores 75/100 against 44/100 for wraft, so it is the safer default.
Incus ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for wraft.
Incus is growing faster right now (+279 stars in 30 days).
Incus details →wraft details →
Swap a project
Keep Incus, compare it with
Keep wraft, compare it with