# Incus vs sdnext

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Incus | sdnext |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 ✓ | 71/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 44 in Container Management | #3 of 11 in Image Generation |
| GitHub stars | 6 516 | 7 362 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +276 ✓ | +16 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v7.0.2 · 16 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Incus scores 75/100 against 71/100 for sdnext, so it is the safer default.

Incus ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for sdnext.

If you want the quickest setup, sdnext is easier to run; Incus needs more configuration.

Incus is growing faster right now (+276 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Incus](https://selfhost.directory/project/incus) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/incus.md)
- [sdnext](https://selfhost.directory/project/sdnext) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/sdnext.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/incus-vs-sdnext