# Incus vs Pi-hole

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Incus | Pi-hole |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 | 87/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 44 in Container Management | #1 of 41 in DNS |
| GitHub stars | 6 518 | 61 542 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +278 | +498 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 ✓ | 6 |
| Latest release | v7.0.2 · 16 Oct 2026 | v6.5 · 17 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Go | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

Pi-hole scores 87/100 against 75/100 for Incus, so it is the safer default.

Incus ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Pi-hole.

If you want the quickest setup, Pi-hole is easier to run; Incus needs more configuration.

## Details

- [Incus](https://selfhost.directory/project/incus) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/incus.md)
- [Pi-hole](https://selfhost.directory/project/pi-hole) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/pi-hole.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/incus-vs-pi-hole