IncusvsPi-hole
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Incus | Pi-hole | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 44 in Container Management | #1 of 41 in DNS |
| GitHub stars | 6 515 | 61 536 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +275 | +492 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 6 |
| Latest release | v7.0.2 · 16 Oct 2026 | v6.5 · 17 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Go | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
Pi-hole scores 87/100 against 75/100 for Incus, so it is the safer default.
Incus ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Pi-hole.
If you want the quickest setup, Pi-hole is easier to run; Incus needs more configuration.
Incus details →Pi-hole details →
Swap a project
Keep Incus, compare it with
Keep Pi-hole, compare it with