IncusvsPhotoPrism
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Incus | PhotoPrism | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 | 76/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 44 in Container Management | #4 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 6 515 | 40 373 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +275 | +140 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 7 |
| Latest release | v7.0.2 · 16 Oct 2026 | 261007-65faaae5d · 7 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Go | Go |
Which one should you pick?
PhotoPrism scores 76/100 against 75/100 for Incus, so it is the safer default.
Incus ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for PhotoPrism.
If you want the quickest setup, PhotoPrism is easier to run; Incus needs more configuration.
Incus details →PhotoPrism details →
Swap a project
Keep Incus, compare it with
Keep PhotoPrism, compare it with