IncusvsMQTTX Web
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Incus | MQTTX Web | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 | 67/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 44 in Container Management | #3 of 10 in IoT |
| GitHub stars | 6 515 | 5 086 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +275 | +22 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 3 |
| Latest release | v7.0.2 · 16 Oct 2026 | v1.13.2 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Incus scores 75/100 against 67/100 for MQTTX Web, so it is the safer default.
Incus ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for MQTTX Web.
If you want the quickest setup, MQTTX Web is easier to run; Incus needs more configuration.
Incus is growing faster right now (+275 stars in 30 days).
Incus details →MQTTX Web details →
Swap a project
Keep Incus, compare it with
Keep MQTTX Web, compare it with