# Incus vs MikroDash

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Incus | MikroDash |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 ✓ | 49/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 44 in Container Management | #27 of 48 in Network Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 6 525 ✓ | 633 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +279 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 ✓ | 10 |
| Latest release | v7.0.2 · 16 Oct 2026 | v0.8.77 · 23 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Incus scores 75/100 against 49/100 for MikroDash, so it is the safer default.

Incus ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for MikroDash.

If you want the quickest setup, MikroDash is easier to run; Incus needs more configuration.

Incus is growing faster right now (+279 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Incus](https://selfhost.directory/project/incus) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/incus.md)
- [MikroDash](https://selfhost.directory/project/mikrodash) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mikrodash.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/incus-vs-mikrodash