# Incus vs llama.cpp

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Incus | llama.cpp |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 | 93/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 44 in Container Management | #2 of 25 in LLM Inference |
| GitHub stars | 6 516 | 132 663 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +276 | +3 306 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 1460 ✓ |
| Latest release | v7.0.2 · 16 Oct 2026 | b11971 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | C++ |

## Which one should you pick?

llama.cpp scores 93/100 against 75/100 for Incus, so it is the safer default.

llama.cpp ships more often: 1460 stable releases in the past year, against 16 for Incus.

If you want the quickest setup, llama.cpp is easier to run; Incus needs more configuration.

llama.cpp is growing faster right now (+3 306 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Incus](https://selfhost.directory/project/incus) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/incus.md)
- [llama.cpp](https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/incus-vs-llamacpp