# inboxzero vs Windows ARM

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | inboxzero | Windows ARM |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 ✓ | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 106 in Email | #7 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 12 847 ✓ | 2 260 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +519 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 29 ✓ | 10 |
| Latest release | desktop-v0.1.21 · 21 Oct 2026 ✓ | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Batchfile |

## Which one should you pick?

inboxzero scores 77/100 against 61/100 for Windows ARM, so it is the safer default.

inboxzero ships more often: 29 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Windows ARM.

If you want the quickest setup, inboxzero is easier to run; Windows ARM needs more configuration.

inboxzero is growing faster right now (+519 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [inboxzero](https://selfhost.directory/project/inboxzero) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/inboxzero.md)
- [Windows ARM](https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/inboxzero-vs-windows-arm