# imgpush vs pinry

> Two self-hosted [Image Management projects](https://selfhost.directory/image-management), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | imgpush | pinry |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 47/100 | 55/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #4 of 9 in Image Management | #2 of 9 in Image Management |
| GitHub stars | 356 | 3 429 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +7 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | BSD-2-Clause |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

pinry scores 55/100 against 47/100 for imgpush, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, imgpush is easier to run; pinry needs more configuration.

pinry is growing faster right now (+7 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [imgpush](https://selfhost.directory/project/imgpush) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/imgpush.md)
- [pinry](https://selfhost.directory/project/pinry) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/pinry.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/imgpush-vs-pinry