# imgpush vs PhotoPrism

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | imgpush | PhotoPrism |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 47/100 | 76/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #4 of 9 in Image Management | #4 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 356 | 40 373 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +140 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 7 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | 261007-65faaae5d · 7 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Python | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

PhotoPrism scores 76/100 against 47/100 for imgpush, so it is the safer default.

PhotoPrism ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for imgpush.

If you want the quickest setup, imgpush is easier to run; PhotoPrism needs more configuration.

PhotoPrism is growing faster right now (+140 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [imgpush](https://selfhost.directory/project/imgpush) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/imgpush.md)
- [PhotoPrism](https://selfhost.directory/project/photoprism) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/photoprism.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/imgpush-vs-photoprism