# imgpush vs Jellyfin

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | imgpush | Jellyfin |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 47/100 | 88/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #4 of 9 in Image Management | #1 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 356 | 58 754 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +1 311 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 15 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v12.4 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | C |

## Which one should you pick?

Jellyfin scores 88/100 against 47/100 for imgpush, so it is the safer default.

Jellyfin ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for imgpush.

If you want the quickest setup, imgpush is easier to run; Jellyfin needs more configuration.

Jellyfin is growing faster right now (+1 311 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [imgpush](https://selfhost.directory/project/imgpush) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/imgpush.md)
- [Jellyfin](https://selfhost.directory/project/jellyfin) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/jellyfin.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/imgpush-vs-jellyfin