# imgproxy vs Zabbix

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | imgproxy | Zabbix |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 | 75/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 13 in Image Processing | #13 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 11 162 ✓ | 6 522 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +67 | +110 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 23 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v4.0.20 · 26 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Go Template |

## Which one should you pick?

Zabbix scores 75/100 against 72/100 for imgproxy, so it is the safer default.

imgproxy ships more often: 23 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Zabbix.

If you want the quickest setup, imgproxy is easier to run; Zabbix needs more configuration.

## Details

- [imgproxy](https://selfhost.directory/project/imgproxy) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/imgproxy.md)
- [Zabbix](https://selfhost.directory/project/zabbix) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zabbix.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/imgproxy-vs-zabbix