# imgproxy vs Windows ARM

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | imgproxy | Windows ARM |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 ✓ | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 13 in Image Processing | #7 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 11 162 ✓ | 2 260 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +67 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 23 ✓ | 10 |
| Latest release | v4.0.20 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Batchfile |

## Which one should you pick?

imgproxy scores 72/100 against 61/100 for Windows ARM, so it is the safer default.

imgproxy ships more often: 23 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Windows ARM.

If you want the quickest setup, imgproxy is easier to run; Windows ARM needs more configuration.

imgproxy is growing faster right now (+67 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [imgproxy](https://selfhost.directory/project/imgproxy) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/imgproxy.md)
- [Windows ARM](https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/imgproxy-vs-windows-arm