# imgproxy vs WBO

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | imgproxy | WBO |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 ✓ | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 13 in Image Processing | #2 of 9 in Whiteboarding |
| GitHub stars | 11 161 ✓ | 2 675 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +69 ✓ | +17 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 23 ✓ | 4 |
| Latest release | v4.0.20 · 26 Oct 2026 | v2.18.26 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

imgproxy scores 72/100 against 61/100 for WBO, so it is the safer default.

imgproxy ships more often: 23 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for WBO.

imgproxy is growing faster right now (+69 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [imgproxy](https://selfhost.directory/project/imgproxy) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/imgproxy.md)
- [WBO](https://selfhost.directory/project/wbo) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wbo.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/imgproxy-vs-wbo