# imgproxy vs openclaw

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | imgproxy | openclaw |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 | 93/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 13 in Image Processing | #1 of 125 in AI |
| GitHub stars | 11 161 | 393 291 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +69 | +2 943 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 23 | 37 ✓ |
| Latest release | v4.0.20 · 26 Oct 2026 | v2026.10.8 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

openclaw scores 93/100 against 72/100 for imgproxy, so it is the safer default.

openclaw ships more often: 37 stable releases in the past year, against 23 for imgproxy.

If you want the quickest setup, imgproxy is easier to run; openclaw needs more configuration.

openclaw is growing faster right now (+2 943 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [imgproxy](https://selfhost.directory/project/imgproxy) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/imgproxy.md)
- [openclaw](https://selfhost.directory/project/openclaw) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openclaw.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/imgproxy-vs-openclaw