# ImgCompress vs Rembg

> Two self-hosted [Image Processing projects](https://selfhost.directory/image-processing), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | ImgCompress | Rembg |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 53/100 | 78/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #8 of 13 in Image Processing | #1 of 13 in Image Processing |
| GitHub stars | 348 | 25 216 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +77 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 ✓ | 11 |
| Latest release | release_0.9.0 · 21 Aug 2026 | v2.0.86 · 21 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Rembg scores 78/100 against 53/100 for ImgCompress, so it is the safer default.

ImgCompress ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for Rembg.

Rembg is growing faster right now (+77 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [ImgCompress](https://selfhost.directory/project/imgcompress) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/imgcompress.md)
- [Rembg](https://selfhost.directory/project/rembg) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/rembg.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/imgcompress-vs-rembg