# ImgCompress vs llama.cpp

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | ImgCompress | llama.cpp |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 53/100 | 93/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #8 of 13 in Image Processing | #2 of 25 in LLM Inference |
| GitHub stars | 348 | 132 699 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +3 244 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 1464 ✓ |
| Latest release | release_0.9.0 · 21 Aug 2026 | b11978 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | C++ |

## Which one should you pick?

llama.cpp scores 93/100 against 53/100 for ImgCompress, so it is the safer default.

llama.cpp ships more often: 1464 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for ImgCompress.

If you want the quickest setup, ImgCompress is easier to run; llama.cpp needs more configuration.

llama.cpp is growing faster right now (+3 244 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [ImgCompress](https://selfhost.directory/project/imgcompress) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/imgcompress.md)
- [llama.cpp](https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/imgcompress-vs-llamacpp