# LLMII (ImageIndexer) vs Stash

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | LLMII (ImageIndexer) | Stash |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 43/100 | 78/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #35 of 41 in Photo Management | #2 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 397 | 13 308 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +302 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 7 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | latest_develop · 24 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | GPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Stash scores 78/100 against 43/100 for LLMII (ImageIndexer), so it is the safer default.

Stash ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for LLMII (ImageIndexer).

If you want the quickest setup, Stash is easier to run; LLMII (ImageIndexer) needs more configuration.

Stash is growing faster right now (+302 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [LLMII (ImageIndexer)](https://selfhost.directory/project/imageindexer) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/imageindexer.md)
- [Stash](https://selfhost.directory/project/stash) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/stash.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/imageindexer-vs-stash