# ImageFlow vs Jellyfin

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | ImageFlow | Jellyfin |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 49/100 | 88/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 9 in Image Management | #1 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 606 | 58 750 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +1 307 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 15 ✓ |
| Latest release | v3.0 · 12 Dec 2025 | v12.4 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | C |

## Which one should you pick?

Jellyfin scores 88/100 against 49/100 for ImageFlow, so it is the safer default.

Jellyfin ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for ImageFlow.

Jellyfin is growing faster right now (+1 307 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [ImageFlow](https://selfhost.directory/project/imageflow) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/imageflow.md)
- [Jellyfin](https://selfhost.directory/project/jellyfin) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/jellyfin.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/imageflow-vs-jellyfin