# illa-builder vs Zammad

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | illa-builder | Zammad |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 70/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 17 in Low Code | #1 of 9 in Helpdesk |
| GitHub stars | 12 336 ✓ | 6 050 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +12 | +98 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Ruby |

## Which one should you pick?

Zammad scores 70/100 against 67/100 for illa-builder, so it is the safer default.

Zammad is growing faster right now (+98 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [illa-builder](https://selfhost.directory/project/illa-builder) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/illa-builder.md)
- [Zammad](https://selfhost.directory/project/zammad) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zammad.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/illa-builder-vs-zammad