# illa-builder vs unopim

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | illa-builder | unopim |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 69/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 17 in Low Code | #1 of 6 in Product Management |
| GitHub stars | 12 336 ✓ | 11 046 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +12 | +47 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 17 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v3.1.3 · 29 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | PHP |

## Which one should you pick?

unopim scores 69/100 against 67/100 for illa-builder, so it is the safer default.

unopim ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for illa-builder.

If you want the quickest setup, unopim is easier to run; illa-builder needs more configuration.

unopim is growing faster right now (+47 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [illa-builder](https://selfhost.directory/project/illa-builder) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/illa-builder.md)
- [unopim](https://selfhost.directory/project/unopim) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/unopim.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/illa-builder-vs-unopim