# illa-builder vs textsnap

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | illa-builder | textsnap |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 ✓ | 45/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 17 in Low Code | #8 of 12 in Document Processing |
| GitHub stars | 12 335 ✓ | 196 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +11 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 2 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v0.4.0 · 29 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

illa-builder scores 67/100 against 45/100 for textsnap, so it is the safer default.

textsnap ships more often: 2 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for illa-builder.

If you want the quickest setup, textsnap is easier to run; illa-builder needs more configuration.

illa-builder is growing faster right now (+11 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [illa-builder](https://selfhost.directory/project/illa-builder) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/illa-builder.md)
- [textsnap](https://selfhost.directory/project/textsnap) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/textsnap.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/illa-builder-vs-textsnap