illa-buildervssupabase-automated-self-host
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| illa-builder | supabase-automated-self-host | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 17 in Low Code | #13 of 15 in Backend as a Service |
| GitHub stars | 12 336 | 506 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +12 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
illa-builder scores 67/100 against 48/100 for supabase-automated-self-host, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, supabase-automated-self-host is easier to run; illa-builder needs more configuration.
illa-builder is growing faster right now (+12 stars in 30 days).
illa-builder details →supabase-automated-self-host details →