# illa-builder vs Single Server

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | illa-builder | Single Server |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 ✓ | 44/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 17 in Low Code | #8 of 11 in Deployment |
| GitHub stars | 12 336 ✓ | 231 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +12 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 2 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v0.2.0 · 21 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

illa-builder scores 67/100 against 44/100 for Single Server, so it is the safer default.

Single Server ships more often: 2 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for illa-builder.

If you want the quickest setup, Single Server is easier to run; illa-builder needs more configuration.

illa-builder is growing faster right now (+12 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [illa-builder](https://selfhost.directory/project/illa-builder) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/illa-builder.md)
- [Single Server](https://selfhost.directory/project/singleserver) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/singleserver.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/illa-builder-vs-singleserver