# illa-builder vs runitor

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | illa-builder | runitor |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 ✓ | 49/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 17 in Low Code | #25 of 51 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 12 336 ✓ | 361 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +14 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 4 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v1.4.1-build.6 · 17 Mar 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Apache-2.0 | 0BSD |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

illa-builder scores 67/100 against 49/100 for runitor, so it is the safer default.

runitor ships more often: 4 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for illa-builder.

If you want the quickest setup, runitor is easier to run; illa-builder needs more configuration.

illa-builder is growing faster right now (+14 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [illa-builder](https://selfhost.directory/project/illa-builder) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/illa-builder.md)
- [runitor](https://selfhost.directory/project/runitor) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/runitor.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/illa-builder-vs-runitor