# illa-builder vs Pinchflat

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | illa-builder | Pinchflat |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 ✓ | 65/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 17 in Low Code | #13 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 12 336 ✓ | 5 431 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +12 | +61 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Elixir |

## Which one should you pick?

illa-builder scores 67/100 against 65/100 for Pinchflat, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, Pinchflat is easier to run; illa-builder needs more configuration.

Pinchflat is growing faster right now (+61 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [illa-builder](https://selfhost.directory/project/illa-builder) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/illa-builder.md)
- [Pinchflat](https://selfhost.directory/project/pinchflat) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/pinchflat.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/illa-builder-vs-pinchflat