# illa-builder vs PairDrop

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | illa-builder | PairDrop |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 75/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 17 in Low Code | #2 of 86 in File Sharing |
| GitHub stars | 12 337 ✓ | 11 714 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +15 | +255 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

PairDrop scores 75/100 against 67/100 for illa-builder, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, PairDrop is easier to run; illa-builder needs more configuration.

PairDrop is growing faster right now (+255 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [illa-builder](https://selfhost.directory/project/illa-builder) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/illa-builder.md)
- [PairDrop](https://selfhost.directory/project/pairdrop) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/pairdrop.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/illa-builder-vs-pairdrop